Stories from readers 58

Agreeing with Reader 56:

There were many defending for Velvet Ribbon about the thing that were brought in long time ago case VR recent brought in, which explains the price difference.Perfectly written that: "and VR brought in this piece one month later than BuckleBuckle..." (Quoted from reader 56).

But, I thought it was mentioned somewhere that because the items she once brought it were much earlier being displayed and sold than other blogs who coincidentally brought in the same piece but months later and selling it at a much chepaer price months later. Now, is this valid still when VR is seling this dress like a month later than Buckle Buckle? Shouldn't it be lower? Whatever it is I am not asking it to be lowered, just curious.

The pictures are very different indeed. I have to agree with some other commentator that photoshopping in the right picture is way too much. Same piece of clothing, but the right one is prettier in terms of colours so then I am sure it more sellable than BB. And yes VR takes great pictures no doubt. Is what you see is what you get?

Some argued what you see on the comp may not be what you see infront of you after purchasing. Yes comp resolution changes but if you would all look at it from different comp resolutions, you can tell me if I am wrong in saying that the right one is more sellable becaues it has been photoshoped. I am not saying BB is not sellable, infact, she should be getting the kudos because she is potraying the actual colour of the dress, so we all know how it looks like before buying and to avoid getting mad and angry when the color is totally out of expected when the dress has arrived.

Reader 56, you have my vote!Thanks ^-^